Palestine Action Wins Bid to Challenge UK Ban
UK High Court allows Palestine Action co-founder to pursue judicial review, questioning impact of group’s ban on freedom of expression.
In a significant development, Huda Ammori, co-founder of the pro-Palestinian campaign group Palestine Action, has won her bid to legally challenge the UK government’s decision to ban the organization under anti-terrorism laws.
The ruling, issued by London’s High Court, opens the door for a full judicial review into whether the proscription infringes on civil liberties, including the right to freedom of expression.
Palestine Action, founded in 2020, has made headlines in recent years for its direct action campaigns targeting Israel-linked companies in the UK. Their protests have involved spraying red paint, blocking access to buildings, and damaging equipment used in arms manufacturing.
The group claims these actions are aimed at ending British complicity in what it describes as Israeli war crimes in Gaza.
Despite these claims, the UK Home Office, led by Interior Minister Yvette Cooper, enacted a ban on the group that came into effect shortly after midnight on July 5, following the failure of a legal appeal to suspend it.
The proscription officially designates Palestine Action as a terrorist organization, making membership a criminal offense punishable by up to 14 years in prison.
The legal challenge centers around the argument that this ban constitutes a “disproportionate interference” with freedom of speech. Judge Martin Chamberlain, in his ruling, stated that Ammori’s case is “reasonably arguable,” thereby granting permission for a judicial review of the government's actions.
The impact of the ban has been immediate and widespread. Since July 5, dozens of individuals have been arrested for holding signs showing support for Palestine Action.
Ammori’s legal team argues that the ban has had a chilling effect on free speech, with individuals voicing support for Palestinian rights now facing increased scrutiny from law enforcement.
The British government, however, maintains its stance. Yvette Cooper emphasized that “violence and criminal damage have no place in legitimate protest,” citing specific incidents such as the breaking into a military base and damaging of two aircraft as justification for the group’s proscription.
Meanwhile, Israel has denied accusations of war crimes in Gaza, following the escalation of violence that began on October 7, 2023, after an attack by Hamas militants on Israeli territory. The ongoing conflict has heightened tensions and intensified scrutiny of activism related to the Palestinian cause worldwide.
The upcoming judicial review will be closely watched by human rights advocates, legal experts, and political observers alike, as it could set a precedent for how far governments can go in limiting activism under national security laws.
For now, Palestine Action remains a banned organization, but Ammori’s legal victory marks the first step in potentially overturning the proscription and reigniting debate on the balance between security and civil liberties in the UK.
This article was previously published on saudimoments. To see the original article, click here